Opposition Questions Modi Over Trump’s Ceasefire Claims & US Mediation in Kashmir
-
Trump’s Ceasefire Claims Spark Controversy
-
US President Donald Trump claimed credit for brokering an India-Pakistan ceasefire, contradicting India’s long-standing “no third-party mediation” policy on Kashmir.
-
Opposition leaders demand answers from PM Modi, who remained silent on Trump’s remarks during his victory speech.
-
-
Opposition Demands Clarity on US Role
-
Congress MP Jairam Ramesh accused Modi of being “upstaged by Trump’s revelations” and questioned:
-
Has India secretly accepted US mediation?
-
Will talks with Pakistan be held on “neutral territory” as Trump suggested?
-
-
Randeep Surjewala (Congress) asked if the ceasefire was linked to US intervention, violating India’s policy.
-
-
Calls for Parliamentary Debate & Government Response
-
CPI(M) leader M.A. Baby demanded a special Parliament session, calling Trump’s preemptive ceasefire announcement “seriously concerning.”
-
RJD’s Manoj Jha urged Modi to publicly reject Trump’s claims and reaffirm India’s bilateral dispute resolution policy.
-
AIMIM’s Asaduddin Owaisi questioned if India was letting Kashmir be internationalized, asking:
-
Why agree to “neutral site” talks?
-
Is the ceasefire just a “Trump-brokered deal”?
-
-
-
Diplomatic & Political Fallout
-
Modi’s silence has fueled speculation that India may be softening its stance under US pressure.
-
If true, this could mark a major shift in India’s foreign policy, risking backlash from nationalists.
-
The opposition warns against “dialogue-baazi” (empty rhetoric) and demands transparency on Kashmir strategy.
-
A Test for Modi’s Leadership
The controversy exposes a growing rift between the government’s diplomatic maneuvers and public posturing on Kashmir. If Modi fails to clarify, it could:
-
Undermine India’s sovereignty claims over Kashmir.
-
Embolden Pakistan to seek more international mediation.
-
Erode domestic trust in Modi’s leadership.
The opposition’s demand for a Parliamentary debate is crucial—without clarity, the government risks appearing subservient to US influence, a dangerous perception in Indian politics. The coming days will reveal whether this is a strategic shift or a diplomatic misstep.